On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 14:29:09 -0400 Jérôme Charaoui <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Stefano, > > Le 2026-09-09 à 13 h 46, Stefano Brivio a écrit : > > Hi Jérôme, > > > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:55:30 -0400 > > Jérôme Charaoui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Le 2026-08-13 à 07 h 29, Stefano Brivio a écrit : > >>> I haven't checked how involved a backport would be in this case, even > >>> though at a glance I'd say it should be doable. > >> > >> I can confirm this is a trivial backport. I've pushed an > >> debian/trixie-backport branch with a prepared NMU here: > >> > >> https://salsa.debian.org/lavamind/passt/-/tree/debian/trixie-backports/ > >> > >> If you're OK with it I can handle the upload itself. > > > > Thanks for looking into this. Yes, that would be very appreciated. > > > > Just one question: on that branch, I can only find a changelog commit, > > but not the actual backport. Is it on another branch, or not committed > > yet, perhaps? > > That's what I meant by "trivial" backport: all the build dependencies > are satisfiable in stable, and the package builds correctly in a stable > chroot. Hah, sorry, I misread, I see what you mean now. Thanks for making it obvious for me. I thought you wanted to backport the specific fix, instead of making an updated version available in trixie-backports. By all means, please go ahead! -- Stefano
