Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> You can't rely on the size of an int or a long int. If the code doesn't
> cope with changes of size on those types, then it needs to use special
> types harcoding the size.

Thank you. I think that this may be the right solution to get rid of the
issues linked to the fuzzyness of the data types.

> In this case "int" have the same size on i386 and amd64 (32bits) but "long
> int" don't (i386: 32bits, amd64: 64bits).
> 
> The correct patch is not to replace those "long int" by "int" but by
> "int32_t" to ensure the size (for this you need to include the header 
> <stdint.h>).
> 
> Georges, can you update the patch accordingly and provide a new version of
> the source package ?

OK, the new package has been uploaded, see
http://debian.ofset.org/dists/etch/main/source/wims_3.56-5.dsc

Best regards,                   Georges.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to