There was a simple wording mistake (possibly a lot of them, but one that I see now :) ) in my previous letter. I repost it to be clear as possible.
=========================================== > > That might be a valid point. > > I'll look whether it can be worked around... > I'll remove the offending line for 2.0.3-3. If I were you, I would seriously consider instead to drop the whole openoffice.org-dev from debian. Not openoffice, just the -dev. Really. If you choose instead dropping that line, then people won't know why on earth does it work differently (meaning: why their programs don't run on windows???) as they learn in the docs, in the forums, etc. They get confused, and move away from openoffice. However, if debian didn't support -dev at all, then they simply download it from openoffice.org, it works for them, and they gonna be happy. If your principles hurt people, I think it is better to not give them something wrong, but its better to wait until somebody provides you a way to compile that dll, and release a -dev package only then. Best regards, Baldvin Kovacs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
