Hi Gregor e.a.,

On 2026/09/16 20:49, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:24:57 +0200, Edmund Lodewijks wrote:

What is lacking for this to be moved ahead? A review?

Someone who applies patches / merges the MR, which means someone with the time, energy, and confidence to understand the issue(s) :)

Yes, understood!

And since the issues and patches are spread across 2 bug reports, 2 upstream issues, 1 MR on salsa, and now this thread on the maintainer mailing list (usually we use [email protected] for discussions, and [email protected] only for package names and BTS traffic and other automated mails, and the BTS for discussions about bugs, so CC'd now), people might lack the overview,

Oh my, I am making a complete mess of things, am I not? I am sorry, Gregor! I didn't want to email you directly, thinking it would be unfair to just heap my newbie questions all on you..

so let's try:

Thank you!

For those not having followed along at home, we have:
...
And all these patches/MRs contain a lot of text :) and TTBOMK (partially) AI-assisted code.

Indeed, since I investigated the problem, but don't write Perl. I do try as best as I can to wrangle the AI into checking every angle and aspect so that it will work, but I have since changed the way I use AI.

My personal thoughts so far are (and others might disagree):
> ...
So my preliminary proposal is to work from MR!1 on salsa, trim it down to just the necessary changes for #1146517 (ppc64el and ppc64), i.e. drop the third patch for #1142815 (47-seg_size.t) and revert the surrounding changes in debian/, _and_ then have someone with a better understanding then me about architectures in Perl review those changes.
Do you want me to trim that MR on Salsa down according to what you wrote, and then we hope that someone will have a look at it? Let me know, and I'll jump on it.

And now I'm sorry that I've written a wall of text :) But maybe this helps us to make progress here.

Thank you, as always, for your thorougness, time, and effort in keeping Debian sane! It is much appreciated and I look up to you for it.

Kind regards,

    Edmund


--
Edmund Lodewijks <[email protected]>
TZ: UTC+2 / GMT+2

Reply via email to