Hi Mark, On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:56:32AM -0400, Mark Gates wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 9:19 AM Michael Banck <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 10:24:46AM -0700, Axel Huebl wrote: > > > Suggested fix: ship also the shared library, which is the upstream > > > default (upstream sets SOVERSION, i.e. liblapackpp.so.1 for > > > 2024.10.26). > > > > Well I thought about this when I initially packaged it, but upstream > > *did seem* to have strict library versioning guarantees when I looked at > > it, but maybe I was missing something? > > Do you mean "did" or "did not" have strict library versioning?
Yeah, I meant did not, sorry. > LAPACK++ uses calendar versioning for releases, but its ABI version should > be strict semantic versioning. The ABI is 2.0.0 since the last release; see > this commit: > > * 298ac33 2025-05-28 01:44 Mark Gates Update ABI and Changelog Thanks, that great to hear. We will move forward with adding a shared library then. Michael
