This is purely down to the default as set in the code in fs.c:
static struct FS supported_fs[] = {
{ "udf", "nosuid,nodev,user", 1, "007", 1 },
{ "iso9660", "nosuid,nodev,user", 1, NULL, 1 },
{ "vfat", "nosuid,nodev,user,quiet,shortname=mixed", 1, "077", 1 },
{ "ntfs", "nosuid,nodev,user", 1, "077", 1 },
{ "hfsplus", "nosuid,nodev,user", 1, NULL, 0 },
{ "hfs", "nosuid,nodev,user", 1, NULL, 0 },
{ "ext3", "nodev,noauto,nosuid,user", 0, NULL, 0 },
{ "ext2", "nodev,noauto,nosuid,user", 0, NULL, 0 },
{ "reiserfs", "nodev,noauto,nosuid,user", 0, NULL, 0 },
{ "reiser4", "nodev,noauto,nosuid,user", 0, NULL, 0 },
{ "xfs", "nodev,noauto,nosuid,user", 0, NULL, 0 },
{ "jfs", "nodev,noauto,nosuid,user", 0, NULL, 1 },
{ NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, 0}
};
As shown, udf is 007. I just patched this for myself. Is there a reason why
udf is 007?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
