Thanks for the clarification. On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 8:12 PM Adam D. Barratt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've updated the architecture list. > > Yes, so far as the mirror list is concerned this is an entirely new > mirror, so it will need to build and maintain its own reputation score > under the new name. > > Regards, > > Adam > > On Fri, 2026-10-09 at 12:53 +0330, navid naghdi wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > > > Thanks a lot for updating the entry and adding the CD image listing! > > > > Two small follow-ups: > > > > 1. The entry kept the old server's architecture line > > (amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 > > s390x). > > The new mirror carries only: > > > > Archive-architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 riscv64 > > > > (plus all and source), as the Architectures-Configuration line in > > > > https://mirror.famaserver.com/debian/project/trace/mirror.famaserver > > .com > > shows. Could you update that line so users on armel, mips64el, > > mipsel, > > ppc64el and s390x aren't directed to us? > > > > 2. Since the pages were regenerated this morning (9 Oct), we no > > longer > > appear on https://www.debian.org/mirror/list or > > https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/ at all — the Iran section is > > gone, > > although mirror-master shows mirror.famaserver.com as up to date > > (score 20.53 and rising). Is this just the new entry building up > > history, or is something else needed on our side? > > > > Thanks, > > Navid Naghdi — FamaServer > >
