Hi Paul, * Paul Gevers <[email protected]> [2026-10-17 09:41]:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:08:21 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <[email protected]> wrote:On Fri, Sep 11, 2026, at 2:22 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:Le 11/09/2026 à 14:16, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit :How can i work around this?By reverting the change. I am not aware of a way to make PGO >>reproducible. this probably warrants some broader discussion.. I think the only way to implement PGO and reproduciblity is to treat the profiles as allowed generated input to the build (i.e., lift the restriction of "all pre-generated parts of the upstream source must be regenerated as part of the build" for them).So, how to move forward? This feels a bit like the community behind reproducible builds should paper out a general solution to deal with PGO in binary distributions, which is unlikely to happen overnight. Do we agree on that? If so, I think we should let rust-coreutils migrate now.
Well, the other option is to revert enabling PGO. But as reproducible builds are still kind of new I would be fine with letting rust-coreutils migrate for trixie and discuss other options after the release.
Which also means that we should ensure "this probably warrants some broader discussion". I have the impression that's somewhat already happening, but I've only seen it on IRC. Can somebody link to broader discussion (if it exists already)?
There is: https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2026-September/004153.html Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
