On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 11:03 AM Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some of the obtained errors for the webex meeting actually seem > to be harmless, as shown by microphone tests I've done with > > https://mozilla.github.io/webrtc-landing/gum_test.html > > (internal microphone, with audio back to my headset, so the same > settings as yesterday). The journalctl logs show: > > Oct 20 10:45:19 qaa bluetoothd[1292]: profiles/audio/a2dp.c:load_remote_sep() > Unable to load LastUsed: rseid 1 not found > Oct 20 10:45:20 qaa kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: SCO packet for unknown > connection handle 513 > Oct 20 10:45:20 qaa kernel: input: WH-1000XM3 (AVRCP) as > /devices/virtual/input/input42 > Oct 20 10:45:20 qaa systemd-logind[1310]: Watching system buttons on > /dev/input/event24 (WH-1000XM3 (AVRCP)) > Oct 20 10:45:30 qaa wireplumber[2492]: pw.node: > (bluez_input.38_18_4C_4B_AC_93.0-148) running -> error (Received error event) > Oct 20 10:45:30 qaa wireplumber[2492]: pw.node: > (bluez_output.38_18_4C_4B_AC_93.1-146) running -> error (Received error event) > Oct 20 10:45:30 qaa wireplumber[2492]: spa.bluez5: Failure in Bluetooth audio > transport /org/bluez/hci0/dev_38_18_4C_4B_AC_93/fd64 > Oct 20 10:45:30 qaa pipewire[2488]: pw.node: > (bluez_input.38_18_4C_4B_AC_93.0-148) running -> error (Received error event) > Oct 20 10:45:30 qaa pipewire[2488]: pw.node: > (bluez_output.38_18_4C_4B_AC_93.1-146) running -> error (Received error event) > Oct 20 10:45:30 qaa bluetoothd[1292]: > /org/bluez/hci0/dev_38_18_4C_4B_AC_93/sep1/fd1: fd(34) ready > > but here, everything is working correctly. > > Such errors are annoying because this means that it is impossible > to know what could be the cause of issues like I had yesterday. > > Now, it is less clear that this is a bug in bluez rather than in > pipewire (or wireplumber). It seems that the AI answer was focusing > on the first error (which is what one should usually do), i.e. the > "load_remote_sep() Unable to load LastUsed: rseid 1 not found" > line above from bluez, but it actually seems to be harmless.
There is a lot of AI-generated text to read and this email seems to contradict the other emails. Could you summarize whether there is still anything that needs to be fixed in bluez? I also get a bit concerned about AI bugs because sometimes, the AI gives people suggestions on things to change in their system and it's unclear whether there are any AI-suggested changes that could cause additional bugs. Is this bug reproducible from a new Debian Testing (or Unstable) install? Thank you, Jeremy Bícha
