On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:10:14 +0000 Charles <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi Syed, > > On Wednesday, 21 October 2026 at 07:04, Syed Shahrukh Hussain > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do have an update ready which is in pipeline due to dependency > > failure on testing. So pushing it to unstable won't be fruitful. > > That shouldn't block bear though. 4.x can go to unstable now and > simply won't migrate until serde-saphyr does? It gets exposure in the > meantime. > > > I didn't have the bandwidth to look into problem with > > debcargo-conf rust-serde-saphyr package. > > The migration block is resource exhaustion on the 32-bit CI runners, > not a bug in serde-saphyr AFAICT. > i386 fails with "No space left on device" while linking the test > binaries. armhf fails on the all-features test. Everything else > passes. I'll take it to the Rust team in debcargo-conf. > Thank you for looking into it. Yes sound good :-) not sure if ignoring the arch or skip-not-installable maybe an option for autopkgtests. > > Do you wish to co-maintain bear package? > > Yes, happy to co-maintain. > > Some Q's > * Move the repo from sramacher/bear to debian/bear on salsa? I will request for migration to salsa/debian. > * Can you push your branch? I'll compare with mine and we merge the > best of both. sure.. a temporary fork for review: https://salsa.debian.org/syed/bear > * Who sponsors the first upload? As far as I know neither of us has DM > rights on bear yet. I will request DM rights, maybe get before or after uploaded. > > Cheers, > Charles > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iHUEARYKAB0WIQTExIAqu3hl1PZ6dpT8wXKOmPFTNwUCatiPWQAKCRD8wXKOmPFT > N/rYAQDxzj4whROkE3y4egaLwYtqg0WPOuMqh9M4xuij3ZF0qgEA2YgMDrZ5MIYQ > cj/0Dagb0CtXnHHRkhH9pIR/M+fyTQ8= > =Yxyu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Regards, Syed Shahrukh Hussain.
pgpkQcVI_wcPn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
