On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 01:41:53PM +0100, Ansgar 🙀 wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2026-11-06 at 12:56 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > I specifically requested not to consider the severity or the RC-ness > > status, but since you mention it: > > > > I see it differently. > > > > If I try to build the package and it fails, even when using nocheck, > > then the source of the package, and more specifically the scripts > > controlling the build, could reasonably be said to be incomplete. > > So Debian would have to bundle the exact compiler used (or an entire > build environment) with every source package as it might otherwise > FTBFS with a newer compiler version (or newer headers, ...) which would > make Debian non-compliant with the license?
No. Can we please concentrate on the request I made and not on these side things? (I think it was a mistake to reply to such part of Stefano's email, because we run the risk to make the thread longer than required. I apologize for that). Thanks.
