Hello Don, Alle Monday 24 July 2006 19:27, Don Geddis ha scritto: > So what's the current status? CMUCL is WONTFIX, and the kernel folks claim > the same thing? Nobody cares that the application and the kernel are no > longer compatible?
I'm not going to create a separate memory layout for debian just because a non-standard kernel is used. The problem is still present the testing kernel 2.4.17-1-686, I updated to BTS entry of bug #360598 to this effect. > At the very least, surely this means that the Debian CMUCL now needs some > kind of new "Required:" package, to document that it is not (and will not be) > compatible with the default 2.6 kernel. I'm open to suggestions on what I should 'require'. ;-) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
