On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:31:33PM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > severity 380698 normal > > tag 380698 confirmed > > merge 380698 336411 > > thanks > > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:11:40AM +0200, Peter Grzybowski <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: firefox > > > Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-3 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > > > > the firefox that can be installed from the package tree, > > > does not run the colorzilla extension, it seems that it is > > > a problem with the libxpcom libs, the binary downloaded > > > from the www.mozilla.com works fine. > > > after overwritting the files in /usr/lib/firefox (or what ever > > > $FIREFOXHOME you have) every thing works, so that is > > > just a matter of packaging. that issue may lead to other > > > problem and yet it may not. firefox can make your tiny life a > > > lot easier when you are working on a web project by its extensions. > > > hope this report helps. > > > > This is a known issue. See bug #336411. > > Is #378667 also this issue? Gal G.A. is claiming that an official > mozilla.org firefox built with gcc 4.1 doesn't have this issue. Could > it have something to do with the way we're compiling it, flags, libs, > etc?
If that were this issue, it would crash. I still need to investigate on #378667, but I don't have much time these days. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
