On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:24:36PM -0500, Justin Pryzby said: > Have you seen bug #203433? > > clamav finds a false positive in nmap-fingerprinting-article.txt.gz. > > I can't find that there's a cloned bug against clamav, but I feel that > it should be either reassigned or cloned. (I can't see that that > article includes any mallicious code, thus a bug). > > Justin > > References > > [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203433
It's a non-issue: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ clamscan /usr/share/doc/nmap/nmap-fingerprinting-article.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/nmap/nmap-fingerprinting-article.txt.gz: OK ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 31478 Scanned directories: 0 Scanned files: 1 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 0.04 MB I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes Time: 0.481 sec (0 m 0 s) Take a look at the submitter's info: ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 8880 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scanned directories: 6304 Scanned files: 95425 Infected files: 1 Data scanned: 3713.65 Mb I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes Time: 1561.047 sec (26 m 1 s) He is not using a standard list of viruses, so his false positive is presumably his problem. cc'ing the original bug and submitter. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | Sic transit gloria mundi. [So passes | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | away the glory of this world.] -- | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | Thomas ` a Kempis | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgp3RXOs6gpqb.pgp
Description: PGP signature