On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:03:23PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote: > >> At the start of mkinitramfs umask is initialized to 0022. > > > I've filed a bug to ask it to be initialised to 0077. Simplest, > > easiest. > > OK, he's reluctant to have it done unconditionally, so I made it a > configuration option. Here is the loop-aes-utils side of that > (untested, roughly done), assuming he takes my second patch.
Too bad, but I think we can live with it. -ENOPATCHATTACHED :-) > The question is, do we want to do it unconditionally when > loop-aes-utils is installed? Should we rather duplicate (or move) the > logic checking for "is the root on encrypted root?" to > /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/loopaes? I've thought about that too. IMHO it would be preferrable to check whether we need it and only set umask if so. Without testing: Could we figure this out in conf.d and export a flag like HAVE_LOOPAES or so to be used by initramfs-tools-hook? cheers, Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
