Loïc Minier wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006, Brice Goglin wrote: > >>> I think this was addressed in recent uploads of gnome-cups-manager / >>> libgnomecups, could you confirm it's fixed? >>> >> I can't be sure that I have seen the bug since gnome-cups-manager >> entered testing 2 weeks ago. I usually was seeing the bug about once >> every 1-2 week. I will close the bug if I don't see the problem in the >> next weeks, say by the beginning of september. >> > > The fix is more likely to be in libgnomecups which is in since far longer: > > libgnomecups (0.2.2-5) unstable; urgency=low > > * Update 24_mem-leak with a nicer version as suggested in the upstream bug > report. > > -- Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:57:57 +0200 > > libgnomecups (0.2.2-4) unstable; urgency=low > > * New patch, 24_mem-leak, by Samuel Mimram to fix memory leak in > gnome_cups_request_add_requested_attributes(). (Closes: #369083, #375891) > > -- Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:38:36 +0200 >
Well, I am pretty sure I have seen the bug in the second half of July. And I don't remember having seen a memory leak problem, I only noticed the CPU utilization problem. I'll let you know if the bug occurs again. Thanks, Brice
