At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also > > be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the > > actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm > > should have such header definition itself. > > Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the > kernel.
Ah, I misunderstood, you're right. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]