Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also note that you are exercising unstable-to-unstable upgrades, which > may have less robust upgrade support (in particular if some of the
Ah, because unstable-to-unstable updates aren't properly supported anymore ? I'm sorry, I didn't get the memo so that's news to me. Where's the problem in supplying transition packages for the packages you are removing, so as to provide a clean upgrade path ? JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
