On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 01:25:28PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Em Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:15:00 -0400 > Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > Because the python-turbogears package provides both development and > > runtime functionality, wouldn't it make more sense to just have it > > work as expected and pull in python-sqlalchemy if you don't have it? > > I have to develop both SQLObject and SQLAlchemy projects depending > > upon the client and what preexisting code there may be. I would > > sincerely recommend not patching quickstart in any way that adversely > > affects using SQLAlchemy with it. > > The patching I did will make quickstart use SQLAlchemy by default if it > is the only ORM available. This may help me uploading TG into unstable > since there's no release for SQLObejct 0.7.1 yet. > > It should not affect using SQLAlchemy adversely. What do you think > about that? That sounds reasonable. I will test it out for you once I get it from experimental.
-- Barry Hawkins All Things Computed site: http://www.alltc.com weblog: http://www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
