tags 367670 + patch upstream tags 368442 + patch upstream thanks Hello all,
Attached to this mail is a patch that solves both problems. * Concerning the multi-line span of emphasise (_): It seems that it was explicitly programmed to not be able to match across multiple lines. I don't see why not? Nobody expects this since it _is_ allowed for italic (__), strong (*), etc. Maybe this non-multi-line limit should be turned of for cite (??) as well? * Concerning the greediness problem for strong (*) and bold (**): As mentioned on the list[0], this only seems to be a problem when single characters are made strong, bold, but also emphasised, subscripted, etc. The reason was a small error in the regexp matching either a series of characters or exactly one. It considered the case of one character later, since the Ruby RE-engine seems to look at alternatives from left-to-right. I have mentioned the patch upstream and also reported the suggestion for multi-line span of emphasise on textism.com, since it doesn't allow for this as well. Regards, Paul fn0. http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/redcloth-upwards/2006-July/000075.html -- Student @ Eindhoven | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
--- lib/redcloth.rb.orig 2005-07-10 02:27:53.000000000 +0200
+++ lib/redcloth.rb 2006-09-06 13:08:33.000000000 +0200
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@
['??', 'cite', :limit],
['-', 'del', :limit],
['__', 'i'],
- ['_', 'em', :limit],
+ ['_', 'em'],
['%', 'span', :limit],
['+', 'ins', :limit],
['^', 'sup'],
@@ -379,14 +379,14 @@
(#{rcq})
(#{C})
(?::(\S+?))?
- (\S.*?\S|\S)
+ (\S|\S.*?\S)
#{rcq}
(?=\W)/x
else
/(#{rcq})
(#{C})
(?::(\S+))?
- (\S.*?\S|\S)
+ (\S|\S.*?\S)
#{rcq}/xm
end
[rc, ht, re, rtype]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
