On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:59:37PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Manolo Díaz wrote: > > > This time is the bug #353518, taged as fixed and archived and shown as > > > outstanding. > > > > Because it's marked as fixed in 1.5-1, which is a version that doesn't > > exist anywhere in Debian. > > > > It should have been marked closed in 1.5.0.5-1. > > > > So the new BTS keeps track of versions that ever existed? Could I > close a bug with 1.5-4 (if it was indeed fixed by that version, but > slipped through accidentially?) then?
If the version in unstable is a descendant of that version, yes. Otherwise you'll have to mark the first version which the version in unstable is a descendant of that fixed the bug as fixed as well. Don Armstrong -- I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum is thrust at me by a hyperactive girl screaming, "Chew more! Do more!" The American will to consume more and produce more personified in a stick of gum. I grab it. -- Chad Dickerson http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
