Hilmar,
I have been on holiday this past few days. Please allow me chance to
find the original problem input file etc tonight and reply. If I
cannot I will let you know.
I hope this is ok.
Thanks,
Noah
On 13/09/06, Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11.09.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 09.09.06 Noah Slater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> >> As far as I remember I was trying to run `pdftex -interaction
> >> batchmode' which at the time was not running in batch mode, but
> >> instead providing me with interactive imput prompts.
> >>
> > A minimal example reads:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ more a.tex
> > iiii
> > \bye
>
> Shouldn't there be an error, in order to test whether tex is
> running interactively, something like
>
> iii \blubber{} aaa
> \bye
>
Hmm, I simply forgot what the batchmode option is good for.... It
works here too.
To sum up:
1. The maintainers can't reproduce the bug
2. The submitter doesn't know any more, what he was exactly doing and
when the bug occured so he can't help them.
Noah, is it OK to close now? If it pops up again later you may
submit a new bug.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
