-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 06:10:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> tags 387760 moreinfo >> thanks >> >> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Victor Seva wrote: >>> Please add linux-wlan-ng modules. >> The copyright file is not appropriate. It lists the MPL which is >> incompatible with the GPL and the modules can't be used under this >> license. > > My understanding is that it is dual-licenced, but then maybe i am wrong. > Victor, can you comment on this ?
AFAIK it's dual-licenced. * COPYING * * Copyright (C) 1999 AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. * -------------------------------------------------------------------- * * linux-wlan * * The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public * License Version 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file * except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of * the License at http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ * * Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS * IS" basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or * implied. See the License for the specific language governing * rights and limitations under the License. * * Alternatively, the contents of this file may be used under the * terms of the GNU Public License version 2 (the "GPL"), in which * case the provisions of the GPL are applicable instead of the * above. If you wish to allow the use of your version of this file * only under the terms of the GPL and not to allow others to use * your version of this file under the MPL, indicate your decision * by deleting the provisions above and replace them with the notice * and other provisions required by the GPL. If you do not delete * the provisions above, a recipient may use your version of this * file under either the MPL or the GPL. * * ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Also, Bastian, why is the modules being MPL a problem ? I mean we have > binary-only modules and such, and it should be ok. The current idea is that > the module interface boundary, as long as it doesn't use GPL-only symbols, > constitute a clean enough barrier so as to not cause GPL-compatibility > problems. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Victor Seva | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' PGP Key ID: 0xDD12F253 | | `- Debian user, admin and contributor | ----------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDE8OS/DSSd0S8lMRAuFWAKCLRKUAW2AvgNUV79/nfo3wH69G9wCfbG7d X2kNwj8mRffqWDpaBiRTGu0= =A/xf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
