Hi Marco!
On Friday, March 11, 2005 at 2:28:40 PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 11, Sergey Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Many mailers [...] use rfc2047-encoded suggested filenames
> This is a standard violation which is not tolerated by the upstream
> author (and me as well) and such a patch has been rejected multiple
> times.
What has been rejected was an option to *send* such bogus attachment
names. Brrr! Evil, even if it accomodates sending to Outlook which
otherwise rejects correct 2231 names and displays "ATT12345.dat".
Sergey wanted to *receive* them, and that option is included in Mutt
since ages.
Bye! Alain.
--
��Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send.��
Jon Postel / Robustness Principle / RFC 1122
