Hi Damyan, That is not a bad idea, although "experimental" [1] is better than "unstable" for this purpose, so that "unstable" remains available for maintaining 1.2.2.
Another idea is that anyone interested in something newer than dosemu 1.2.2 could use the upstream infrastructure [2] to help upstream with fixing any problems in dosemu 1.3.3 to help upstream to release dosemu 1.3.4 (or 1.4.x) as stable [3]. I have a slight preference for the latter idea because I believe that upstream has a better knowledge of the regressions in 1.3.3 and maybe most regressions are already fixed in the upstream sources repository. [1]: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources#s-experimental [2]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/dosemu [3]: http://dosemu.sourceforge.net/stable/ Regards, Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
