On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:05:48PM -0400, Federico Grau wrote: > Etch is "testing", I'm interested in getting the pam in "unstable" updated.
> If you say not now ... when can that happen? Once there is a version of pam in testing that is sufficient for the etch release, and there is no further need of using unstable for pam updates for etch. > While I understand the desire to freeze pam for etch, can the pam rlimits > patch get added (this is critical to get realtime kernel support from the > kernel especially important for multimedia and audio applications). Yes, that is one of the two fixes that I'll be including in my next upload. > I am willing to invest time and help with this. Thanks for the offer, but given that pam is one package where I'm unwilling to trust any patches given to me by other people without a *lot* of thought and review, I don't believe that there's anything you can do here to help. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
