On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:29:45PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Hi! Hi there.
> There seems to be a little typo in section 9.1 _Best practices > for security review and design_: > > "the cost in this later phase is sixty sixty times higher" > This has been fixed in CVS and in the 3.9 version I uploaded today. Thanks for the report, however, if you could foolproof the full manual I would really appreciate it (but use the version published at the website, as it is built from the latest CVS sources and might be more up-to-date than the version distributed in the harden-doc package). Regards Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
