On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:56:46PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Paolo said: > > ... and depends on just libclamav. > > I see your argument, but we already have clamscan that is client only.
yes, but clamscan has nothing to do with clamd, and needs -data/-freshclam to be of any use (unless dB is eg nfs-mounted, that is). > sort of like needless package bloat. OTOH at present to get just clamdscan one needs to install needless stuff. I see clamscan, clamd+clamdscan as 2 different things. Deploying clamd in a LAN would let me deploy a quick & lightweight 0 maint solution (clamdscan) for virus checking eg. whenever stuff comes in locally (eg. usbkeys). Of course, I have the opt to nfs-export+mount what's needed/usr but still think a slim standalone clamdscan .deb is a better solution. thanks -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
