On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:37:59PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:43:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: libxul0d > > > Version: 1.8.0.7-1 > > > > > > the package provides symlinks for > > > > > > /usr/lib/xulrunner/libxpcom.so > > > /usr/lib/xulrunner/libxul.so > > > /usr/lib/xulrunner/libmozjs.so > > > /usr/lib/xulrunner/libplc4.so > > > /usr/lib/xulrunner/libplds4.so > > > /usr/lib/xulrunner/libnspr4.so > > > > > > is there a reason that libgtkembedmoz.so and libxpcomglue.so are > > > missing? > > > > These links are there for components and plugins that would be linked > > against these sonames (without the version), and that would be loaded by > > libxul itself. > > > > The libgtkembedmoz.so and libxpcomglue.so files are files you may use to > > link against libxul, in which case you get linked against the > > appropriate sonames (with the version) > > > > Are you saying the libgtkembedmoz.so and libxpcomglue.so are not even in > > /usr/lib in the -dev package ? > > no, they exist. but packages like eclipse explicitely check for > MOZILLA_HOME/libgtkembedmoz.so.
*sigh* when will they stop the dlopen madness ? Isn't it possible to link against libgtkembedmoz instead ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
