Jaakko Kangasharju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I see why this bug has fallen into a crack.  Jaakko Kangasharju is the
> > caretaker for gnus-bonus-el, but this file isn't in that package.
> >
> > 1st question:  should gnus-BTS.el be moved from debian-el to
> >  gnus-bonus-el?  I can see arguments for both sides?
> 
> To me it seems like gnus-BTS is small enough and self-contained enough
> so that it could well be in gnus-bonus-el.  But if you think it's
> better to have all Debian-related things in the same package, I won't
> argue.

I don't feel strongly about it.  At some point in the past, it seemed
resonable to put all Debian specific functions together, but a gnus user
is also likely to have gnus-bonus-el installed.

> > 2nd question: Jaakko, whether we move it or not, would you mind
> looking
> >  into the patch to see whether it's appropriate?
> 
> Sure, I'll do that.  I had already decided to do it when I saw the
> mail now; I figured gnus-BTS part of my responsibility no matter which
> package it is in. 

Abbosultely.  It's the same source package and that's what matters.

>                    I just haven't used it, so I didn't think to look
> at it before.

It's great that you are willing to take care of it.  Thanks!

> "Service to the Group!  Glory to the Project!"

Sounds good to me!  ;-)

Peter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to