Hi Amaya, On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:04:52PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > > A new upstream release of subtitleeditor is out [1]. Please consider > > packaging it. Thanks. > > Yes, I have already done so, but: > > Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:33:28 -0800 > From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: subtitleeditor_0.11-3_i386.changes REJECTED > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 29 20:39:34 2006 > > Rejected: subtitleeditor_0.11-3_i386.deb: old version > (0.11-alpha2-2) in unstable >= new version (0.11-3) > targeted at unstable. > Rejected: subtitleeditor_0.11-3.dsc: old version > (0.11-alpha2-2) in unstable >= new version (0.11-3) > targeted at unstable. > > The package is available for download from: > http://www.amayita.com/debian/subtitleeditor/old/subtitleeditor_0.11-3_i386.deb > > I will try to solve this and upload soon.
Indeed, quite normal behaviour from dak which believes that the Debian version is -alpha2-2. Surely, the last thing to do would be to use an epoch. A good option is to use a new upstream release suffix, such as 0.11a, like I did when I modified the upstream tarball of yaboot which contained already built binary objects. However, here if you look at what I wrote, you see that the upstream release is 0.11.1, so there you have a new upstream tarball and release which will superseed 0.11-<whatever>. ;) Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Free Software Developer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
