Hi, On Sun, Nov 05, 2006, Bastian Venthur wrote: > I've renamed the package gtk2-engines-gtk-qt-engine to gtk-qt-engine.
Argh, your package name doesn't match the policy at all: bee% apt-cache rdepends libgtk1.2 | grep engine gtk-engines-xenophilia gtk-engines-thinice gtk-engines-redmond95 gtk-engines-raleigh gtk-engines-qtpixmap gtk-engines-pixmap gtk-engines-notif gtk-engines-mist gtk-engines-metal gtk-engines-lighthouseblue gtk-engines-industrial gtk-engines-eazel gtk-engines-begtk bee% apt-cache rdepends libgtk2.0-0 | grep engine gtk2-engines-xfce gtk2-engines-wonderland gtk2-engines-qtpixmap gtk2-engines-pixbuf gtk2-engines-magicchicken gtk2-engines-gtk-qt gtk2-engines-cleanice gtk2-engines gtk2-engines-pixbuf gtk2-engines Could you please rename to gtk2-engines-qt? It's really bad now that it's in testing already, and so close to release. > Your package somehow rdepends on it, so please update your > depends/recommends/conflicts/... field to the new package name. The dependency is a "Conflicts", I need to keep it, especially for compatibility with Ubuntu, but it is only in experimental, so I'm not updating it right now (I will update it when the package moves to unstable). gtk2-engines-gtk-qt from the archive completely, and I'll remove the Conflicts; this will be presumably etch+1. > I still provide a dummy package with the old name depending on the new > package, but I plan to remove it for etch+1. Please file another bug when you *remove* gtk2-engines-gtk-qt from the archive completely, and I'll remove the Conflicts. Yes, this needs to be etch+1. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
