On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:39:00PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Anyway, why keep an empty package on all those architecture. > Why not let perl-base provide libperl5.8 and kill libperl5.8 on those > architectures. > Or have libperl5.8 always contain the actual shared library and have > perl-base depend on libperl5.8 (that would have to be essntial: yes) on > those architectures?
Because you can't have a versioned dependency on a virtual package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
