Am Montag, den 30.10.2006, 14:03 +1100 schrieb Craig Small: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Seems I forgot it. Now it is attached too. > > > > I merged both reports, because they IMO belong together. > foo.1 is not a patch, it is an example output and I cannot easily see > how to merge it into the manpage.xml.ex > > Can you either send a diff or a completely new manpage.xml.ex?
I sent a manpage.xml.ex example [1] earlier. Anyway, I included a very large example [2][3] to the docbook-xsl package. Maybe you just have a look at it and adopt the improvements from this example. One thing, that could be removed from my example: the dhdate entity and the <date> tags - because the XSL-stylesheets now produce the date automatically, if no date is provided. I will update this with the next docbook-xsl package. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383495;msg=5 [2] /usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl/examples/foo.1.example_manpage.xml.gz [3] http://alioth.debian.org/plugins/scmcvs/cvsweb.php/packages/docbook-xsl/debian/examples/?cvsroot=debian-xml-sgml PS: Sorry for the late answer - I was offline with a hardware failure. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
