On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 10:58 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > I think a reasonable way to deal with this is to upgrade schedutils
> to
> > the last released upstream, 1.5.0. Actually, the only change is the
> > adding of this binary, so it's a pretty low risk upgrade.
> 
> Yes, that's the way to go. However, last time I checked, ionice only
> worked on 3 architectures. Maybe the one in util-linux's latest
> upstream version is better, and has to be backported. 

That seems better than nothing... I'm not sure about the backporting,
afterall, we are quite close to a release. I'll see what util-linux has,
but the best way is the least invasive way, at this point :)

> I don't know when I have time, so just to be on the safe side, go
> ahead and NMU it.

I'll check it out and let you know.


Thijs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to