Marco d'Itri, le Mon 13 Nov 2006 20:29:03 +0100, a écrit :
> On Nov 13, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, this would work, but as I said, this isn't acceptable, because that
> > would mean listing all possible phone devices, while the OBEX capacity
> > (hence the possibility of using it through fuse) can be detected in a
> > generic way by using
> >
> > ATTR{bInterfaceClass}=="02", ATTR{bInterfaceSubClass}=="0b".
>
> And what's wrong with this?
>
> ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}=="02", ATTRS{bInterfaceSubClass}=="0b"
It doesn't work: even
ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}=="02", ATTRS{bInterfaceSubClass}=="0b", RUN="touch
/tmp/foo"
doesn't create /tmp/foo when I plug it in. The following, however, does
create it:
ATTR{bInterfaceClass}=="02", ATTR{bInterfaceSubClass}=="0b", RUN="touch
/tmp/foo"
but as you said, GROUP= doesn't have any effect.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
