> >> 2) A diversion is created and referenced to /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 (but this >> link >> is never created in /usr/lib). > I'm not sure what you are getting at here. /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 from > libgl1-mesa-glx is diverted to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa > which shows up if libgl1-mesa-glx is installed. What link in /usr/lib > are you talking about?
I'm sorry, I didnt understand the proper function of a "diversion". So if a package tries to install one of the "diverted" files, it gets placed in /usr/lib/nvidia (with an xlibmesa extension). > >> 3) Incorrect links are created in /usr/lib/nvidia for libGL.so.xlibmesa, >> libGL.so.1.xlibmesa, and libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa. Should all of these >> "xlibmesa" >> library links refer to /usr/lib/libGL.so? >> > No, these are diversions of symlinks, not properly functioning ones. > > So, the libraries in /usr/lib/nvidia are not really used, but kept to store the "diverted" file? I guess I got confused when I saw this in /usr/lib/nvidia: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 425320 2006-10-13 03:55 libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2006-11-14 08:53 libGL.so.1.xlibmesa -> /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2006-11-14 17:24 libGL.so.xlibmesa -> /usr/lib/libGL.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 493686 2006-10-16 19:23 libglx.so.xlibmesa -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 107396 2006-11-14 19:33 libnvidia-cfg.so.1.0.9742 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2324 2006-11-14 19:33 libnvidia-tls.so.1.0.9742 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3220 2006-11-14 19:33 tls_test -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3384 2006-11-14 19:33 tls_test_dso.so Note the links of libGL.so.*.xlibmesa. It didnt seem correct when I first glanced at it. Best Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
