John,

Take a deep breath.  Please start a discussion with the maintainer
before attempting an NMU, its generally considered courteous to
give more than 45 mins notice (which was the time between this
bug and your NMU problem report).

On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 11:23 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Package: xfsprogs
> Version: 2.8.11-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss

Sorry, but you've not given any evidence of that here.

> This may be "only" grave instead of critical, but it looks to me like it
> is a Big Deal and unquestionably RC in any case.

These are actually all relatively minor problems, and have all been
there for a long time in xfsprogs.

> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/11/msg00630.html
>   mentions that the latest versions contain fixes for kernel bugs

The XFS experts do not hang out on debian-devel, so I'd take most
of those comments with a pinch of salt (except for the one that said
talk to the maintainer before attempting an NMU ;)

> I *personally* encountered trouble today, which looks like remnants from
> when I was running a kernel before 2.6.18.  I will likely prepare an NMU
> for this in short order.

You've given no details.  I can only guess that you're refering to
the dir2 corruption problem of 2.6.17.[0-7] - that particular problem
was resolved in 2.8.11 which was uploaded as soon as a fix was
available.

However, I'll look into doing an upload soon.  Please do not do an NMU.
As you can see if you read the changelog more carefully, there has been
substantial work done on scaling xfs_repair since .11.  Thats relatively
risky change, so I want to let it get some soak time before uploading.

thanks.

-- 
Nathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to