Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:41:01PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Mats Erik Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > This bug/deficiency has a trivial solution, in my
>> > view at least. Is there some reason the attached patch
>> > should not be applied to the upstream original? There
>> > is indeed a minute risk that the timing inside the
>> > shell between the actions
>>
>> I personally liked this patch. Does any other maintainer disagree with
>> me? Otherwise I can commit it.
>
> Not that I object to it, but I think it should be committed upstream first,
> and Mats seems to agree with me:
There're any news regarting to it?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
