-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, October 27, 2006 22:08, Neil Williams wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote on Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:27:47 +0200
The maintainer has just uploaded a packaged version of latest 2.1.7,
>
> There appears to be no sign of this upload and the current package
> still FTBFS. See bugs #380713, #284770 and #376381 (merged).

The package has been rejected from NEW, there was a problem with the
library packaging. I hope the maintainer will fix that soon and upload a new revision.

> dbmail probably does need to be removed.

I don't see any advantage in that - it's currently not in testing, and keeping it in sid doesn't do much harm. There's plans to revive it, so what would we gain with removal?

1. Completion of the automake -> automake1.4 transition.
2. Remove one block of the debconf-2.0 transition.
3. Removal of a package that is completely broken.

It is misleading to leave so many tags "pending" when there has been no sign of a fix since the rejection.

*Please* remove dbmail:
- - Last upload in Nov 2004
- - 2 Grave functionality bugs, over a year old
- - 6 Serious policy violations, most over a year old, one over 2yr.
- - Has never been part of a stable release
- - Only 5 respectively 1 popcon user
- - Two open security problems 290833 and 303991
- - blocking the automake transition
- - blocking the debconf-2.0 transition
- - unsatisfiable Depends: libmysqlclient10
- - unsatisfiable Depends: libpq3 (>= 7.4)
- - incomplete debian/copyright

It's not just the current 1.2.11-1, the oldest RC bug applies to 1.2.8b

http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=dbmail

IMHO, leaving dbmail in Debian makes a mockery of Debian QA. It's broken, been broken for two years, has security problems, simply won't build - I can see absolutely no reason to retain it.

Fixing the RC bugs isn't sufficient - the package needs maintenance and in the absence of an acceptable new release or an active Debian maintainer, the only option that I can see is removal.

- --
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFbAE4k7DVr6iX/QIRAiWOAJ4s1qncuC87nklLg6VPwWIMhG5XzQCeMxGt
dPdy5n0r0Qi6YUB0ltFz//U=
=1j7J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to