On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:36:00AM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le dimanche 03 décembre 2006 à 18:27 -0800, Keith Packard a écrit : > > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 00:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > I see the same situation while my fonts are Bitstream Vera. > > > > > > I think Loïc's analysis is wrong here, as XUL isn't using the condensed > > > version of the DejaVu (or Vera) fonts. For most pages, it is using the > > > Nimbus Sans fonts. Which means there is a serious regression somewhere, > > > as this bug had been fixed a long time ago. > > > > Hmm. I can't see how that would happen unless the upgrade smashed your > > configuration files somehow. Can you poke at this using fc-match and see > > what that does? > > I first thought of a configuration issue, and I can confirm that the > configuration files are exactly the same. Reverting the library brings > back Bitstream Vera in XUL applications. > > This doesn't seem to be a problem for e.g. GNOME applications, only for > the weird things XUL is doing with fontconfig. I'm CC-ing glandium in > case he has a clue.
Well, I have the latest version of fontconfig, and didn't see any regression with xul applications or others... but I think I don't have the nimbus fonts installed... In what applications do you see that, with which backend (xft or pango or both) ? Mike
