On Monday 04 December 2006 18:21, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:32:20AM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > > One closely related thing: I don't know if you saw it on exim-dev, but > > > I've noticed that LOCAL_SCAN_ABI_VERSION_MAJOR and > > > LOCAL_SCAN_ABI_VERSION_MINOR haven't changed since Exim 4.14 where you > > > introduced the localscan_dlopen patch, even though new functions have > > > been added to the API.
> I think I can say this: LOCAL_SCAN_ABI_VERSION_MINOR should have been
> incremented some time ago, but since nothing actually has depended on it,
> incrementing it with the addition of exim4-dev should work.
Hmm. Upon closer inspection, it seems that upstream included the
LOCAL_SCAN_ABI_VERSION* defines in Exim 4.20. Then upstream is to blame,
after all.
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgp1mBzIjCXna.pgp
Description: PGP signature
