Hi, (Cc-ing Peter Collingbourne, since he could have some opinion about the point 3. below)
Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/12/2006): > pygraphviz is not yet in the archive (in NEW), but pydot is, so I > think networkx should declare some sort of relationsip with pydot. I > suggest: I know about pygraphviz stuck in NEW (see #399280 :-)), and noticed that pydot entered the archive quite recently, but I didn't find time to test it properly before considering adding python-pydot to Recommends:. > Rationale > 1. It should not be Depends, because networkx is perfectly functional > and useful without dot interfaces. > 2. Perhaps it should be Recommends, because one normally expects > drawing functionality of networkx to work. Perfectly agreed. > 3. pygraphviz and pydot should be alternative, because if you have > one, you don't need the other. I don't know much about pydot, but maybe they can conflict is some way, as they provide the same kind of functionality. Should they conflict with eachother or something like that? > 4. pygraphviz should be preferred over pydot, because upstream does > so. Agreed as well. Thanks, -- Cyril Brulebois
pgpo8tJfffXBM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
