Stefan Hornburg dijo [Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:02:02PM +0100]: > >As I'm closing the two above mentioned bugs in a single operation, and > >the process for them is really trivial, I'm only sending a single > >patch for both bugs. > > Your patch is missing a couple of things, like correct rules file. > Never mind, I'm working on a version for upload.
Huh?
I tried not to touch more than what was needed for the specific points
I mentioned in the changelog - The rules file _is_ valid (or I didn't
understand what you meant ;-) )
> W: liburi-perl: package-has-a-duplicate-relation depends: perl, perl (>=
> 5.6.0-16)
>
> That gives a Lintian warning, therefore I will not take this change
> unless advised otherwise.
Umh, strange, as it didn't complain for me - Just the opposite, my
build complained that ${perl:Depends} was an invalid substitution.
Anyway, as this patch is -as I said- quite trivial and mostly about
keeping the package up to date, I'd still suggest you apply the
individual parts of it. And although the RC-buggyness of shipping
non-free RFCs has been tagged as etch-ignore, I'd prompt you to apply
that part if it does not make life harder for you :)
Greeetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
