Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Qua, 2006-12-06 Ã s 00:37 +0100, Joerg Schilling escreveu:
> > > Applying the patch in the attachment is all that's needed to (always)
> > > use "-iso-level 4". I'll work on a better patch that will adapt the
> > > options used according to the depth of the tree, so that we have an
> > > image as backward compatible as possible, without limiting the the kind
> > > of data the user adds to the disc.
> >
> > This is a bad idea as not all OS properly deal with ISO-9660:1999 (not only
> > DOS). Using -D should be an exception.
>
> What I intend to do is use "-iso-level 4" when the tree is deeper than
> allowed by ISO9660:1988 and "-iso-level 3" otherwise. Is this right? Or
> is there an option to produce ISO9660:1988 compatible CDs with deeper
> trees?
It is unclear what you like to do.....
If you use pure ISO-9660, the only way to handle deep trees is ISO-9660:1999.
But people usually use Rock Ridge extensions.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
