Am I right in assuming that the patches submitted by Bas are what's
included as 300_iconv.diff in the source package? (AFAICS the only
differences seem to be due to different dates plus some packaging).
If so it looks like the last version (patch5) inadvertently disabled
itself:
--- slrn-0.9.8.1pl1.eerst/debian/patches/00list 2006-03-31 18:03:56.000000000
+0200
+++ slrn-0.9.8.1pl1/debian/patches/00list 2006-03-31 19:14:38.000000000
+0200
@@ -11,4 +11,3 @@
208_slrnrc-conv.diff
209_optic.diff
210_doc-fix.diff
-300_iconv.diff
Or is there another reason why the patch is included in the source but
disabled?
For what it's worth I have been using slrn with the patch for a few
months in a UTF-8 environment and haven't noticed any problems.
Can the patch be reenabled for Etch? (Yes, I know Etch has just been
frozen)
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | I know I'd be respectful of a pirate
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | with an emu on his shoulder.
| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Sam in "Freefall"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
