On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Thomas Huriaux wrote: > > I support pine only partially, so I have added debconf stuff to > > allow for unattented installs, but that's all. > > Do you allow me or any other people caring about i18n to do the job for > you, either by NMUing the package or by providing full patches? Or > should we just stay away from that package?
You should stay away, really. In addition to being non-free, there are two additional reasons why I think this should not be done, as it would be a complete waste of time: a) It is likely that pine will eventually be replaced by alpine (once alpine is mature enough). b) There should be a mta-base package on which packages like this may depend, so that we do not duplicate the same debconf questions about /etc/mailname and /etc/news/server over and over again in every package managing those files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]