Joey Hess wrote: > I note that we still arn't 100% sure we've caught every last upgrade > issue involving /usr/doc, since AFAIK puiparts has not been used to > test upgrades of everything.
Pity :( > Also, I see that there are still some lintian warnings about it at > http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html > but I guess these are obsolete, since it was last updated in August. I > spot-checked a couple of packages and they seem fixed. More up2date findings: http://merkel.debian.org/~ballombe/lintian-etch-i386/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html Still obsolete packages, though. > Yes, I think it's time to reassign it to base-files, to get the > directory removed on upgrade if it's empty. Yay! -- ยท''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution : :' : -- Emma Goldman `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com