Hi On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:39:58PM +0100, Daniel Dehennin wrote: > Le 4877 Septembre 1993, Ola Lundqvist a tapoté: > > I have a question about the other part of the patch, and that > > is the removal of the useless syscall things thing. Is that > > needed for this to work? > > Yes, if you disable the alternative syscall with the use of dietlibc, > gcc complains that syscall is already defined in > /usr/lib/include/sys/syscall.h. > > > The other question is if a condition about gcc >= 4.1 was needed > > or if gcc-4.1 was enough? > > Well, I made a test with gcc 4.2 and it doesn't work...
Now I'm confused. What did not work with 4.2? Regards, // Ola > -- > Daniel 'NebuchadnezzaR' Dehennin > Récupérer ma clef GPG: > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x2A408F69 > -- --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ---- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://opalsys.net/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
