>>>>> "Sami" == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  Sami> Narayan Desai wrote:
  >>>>>>> "Sami" == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
  Sami> I agree here, a simple failback to force-reload would be a
  Sami> simple solution. But on a long term it would be a good idea to
  Sami> catch the errors and report them back to the server and
  Sami> possibly attempt reconfigure later.
  >> 
  >> Should we change the default to force-reload for debinit? it can
  >> be overridden by using the reload attribute for services. If
  >> force-reload is mandatory, then we should probably use
  >> it. Thoughts?

  Sami> I think it might be a good idea. Since it will always do the
  Sami> right thing, reload when reload is available and restart when
  Sami> it's not.

  Sami> Some error handling would still be a good thing.

I've added this in revision 2640.

  >> We have an analogous issue with fedora, except force-reload ->
  >> condrestart, so I was thinking about changing it chkconfig to use
  >> condrestart...

  Sami> Doesn't Fedora conform to LSB? force-reload is defined by LSB
  Sami> and i kind of assumed that Fedora played along...

Based on a quick look at a fc6 vm, it looks like condrestart is a lot
more common than force-reload. We can set the defaults to force-reload
on debian and use condrestart with chkconfig.
 -nld

Attachment: pgp5iRXEZplC2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to